Prisma Strategic Guideline 9 eDemocracy
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Testing the PRISMA-Equity 2012 Reporting Guideline: the Perspectives of Systematic Review Authors
Reporting guidelines can be used to encourage standardised and comprehensive reporting of health research. In light of the global commitment to health equity, we have previously developed and published a reporting guideline for equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012). The objectives of this study were to explore the utility of the equity extension items included in PRISMA-E 2012 from ...
متن کاملExplaining eDemocracy development: A quantitative empirical study
The increased usage of information and communication technology and especially the Internet as a vehicle for democratic participation may be regarded in very different ways. First of all, the development of ‘eDemocracy’ may be seen as a matter of increased instrumental opportunity: these applications are purposively developed because the Internet provides new and better ways of reaching the cit...
متن کاملTowards An Enabling Framework for eDemocracy Towards an Enabling Framework for eDemocracy through the Integration of Citizen Participation along the Spatial Dimension Using Free and Open Source Technologies
The concept of eDemocracy goes beyond that of eGovernment by allowing more direct citizen participation in decision making, permitting citizens a greater influence on policy outcomes. Getting more people involved results in better decisions, better transparency and an increase in people’s confidence on the elected government. The key commodity in an eDemocracy is information. This information h...
متن کاملExtending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration
BACKGROUND The promotion of health equity, the absence of avoidable and unfair differences in health outcomes, is a global imperative. Systematic reviews are an important source of evidence for health decision-makers, but have been found to lack assessments of the intervention effects on health equity. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) is a 27 item ...
متن کاملEvaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
BACKGROUND The PRISMA Statement is a reporting guideline designed to improve transparency of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses. Seven extensions to the PRISMA Statement have been published to address the reporting of different types or aspects of SRs, and another eight are in development. We performed a scoping review to map the research that has been conducted to evaluate the uptake a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003